THE GOOD ARCHITECT

CLARITY.NOT HYPE.

We break down emerging technologies so engineers can build with confidence.

21
OCT

ChatGPT Atlas: A Smarter, More Natural Browser, But Not a Revolution

AI & ML, Web Browsers

Atlas is a Chromium-based browser with ChatGPT built directly into its core. OpenAI designed it around a different assumption: that your first action online will be a conversation, not a query.

Current Constraints

  • macOS-only: No Windows or Linux support yet
  • Agent Mode: Slow and unreliable in current release
  • No multi-workspace: Can't organize tabs into separate workspaces

Atlas vs Chrome: Two Paths to an AI Browser

ChatGPT Atlas
Chrome (AI Mode + MCP)
Core idea
LLM-native browsing
Traditional browser extended with AI features
Context handling
Persistent GPT context per page
Mostly stateless prompts
Business model
Subscription → ads later
Ads now + AI Overviews monetized
Dev extensibility
GPTs + Actions (sandboxed)
DevTools MCP: LLMs can inspect / control live Chrome
Strategic goal
Capture user intent early
Preserve ad monetization during AI shift
Our Take:

Chrome remains the stronger product overall, faster, more stable, and more extensible, with a proven ad engine behind it. Atlas is the cleaner implementation of LLM-assisted browsing, focused on usefulness first and monetization later.

It's not redefining what a browser is, it's executing the obvious next step. But if Atlas scales, ads will definitely be a part of it, not necessarily as banners, but as context-level sponsorships inside the conversation itself.

Recommendation:

Use Atlas for a seamless AI-first browsing experience with persistent context.

Stick with Chrome for stability, speed, and deep developer integration.

The upcoming browser war won't be about speed. It'll be about who controls user intent, and how they monetize it.

29
SEP

Anthropic Unveils Claude Sonnet 4.5: The New Coding Champion

AI & ML, Developer Tools

Anthropic just dropped Sonnet 4.5, claiming it's the best coding model out there.

SWE-bench Verified Scores

Claude Sonnet 4.5
77.2%
Claude Opus 4.1
74.5%
GPT-5
68%

Key Features

  • 200K context window: Read approximately 500 pages of code at once
  • Agent SDK with state persistence: Remembers context between API requests
  • Multi-step workflows: Chain tasks like "find bugs, write tests, fix them"

Pricing per Million Tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input$3
Output$15
Claude Opus 4.1
Input$15
Output$75
GPT-5
Input$1.25
Output$10
Our Take:

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the new coding leader. It scores 77.2% on SWE-bench, ahead of GPT-5 at 68% and Opus 4.1 at 74.5%.

You'll pay a bit more for that performance. Sonnet costs about 50% more on output ($15 vs $10 per million tokens), and since coding is mostly output-heavy, you can expect total costs to be roughly 1.5 times higher than GPT-5.

Even so, the value is clear. Sonnet outperforms Opus while being five times cheaper, making it the smarter choice when quality matters.

Recommendation:

Use Sonnet 4.5 when accuracy and reliability are the priority.

Choose GPT-5 if you need to control costs and for simpler tasks.

Avoid Opus 4.1 since it's more expensive and less capable for most tasks.